This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 2245–2256, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.224
Scheme 1: Chemical structures of type I–IV species and principal synthetic strategy to obtain type II–IV comp...
Figure 1: Chemical structures of reviewed pairs of diamagnetic Ni(II) and the corresponding Cu(II) complexes.
Figure 2: Top: Schematic representation of the successful co-crystallization of a mixture of two different Cu...
Figure 3: Experimental (E) and simulated (S) X-band ESR spectra of 4@3 at 90° orientation (B0 molecular plan...
Figure 4: Scheme of the principal axes of the Cu and N HF tensors and the g-tensor. Reproduced with permissio...
Figure 5: Experimental (E) and simulated (S) Davies ENDOR spectra of 8@7 at (ν = 9.56 GHz, T = 20 K) at six d...
Figure 6: Experimental (E) and modeled (M) EDNMR spectra of 8@7 at the Q-band frequency, at T = 20 K and at f...
Figure 7: Selected values of calculated versus experimentally determined spin densities of 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10...
Figure 8: EDNMR-determined spin densities of the N donor atoms of 8 and 10 and J values of their correspondin...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 789–800, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.82
Figure 1: Chemical structures of type I–IV complexes.
Figure 2: Expected J couplings between the central and terminal paramagnetic metal ions in type III/IV comple...
Scheme 1: Synthesis of the heterotrinuclear CuIINiIICuII type IV complexes 1–3.
Figure 3: ORTEP diagrams (50% ellipsoid probability) of the molecular structures of 1A (top), 2A (middle) and ...
Figure 4: Magnetization versus magnetic field M(H) of 1 at T = 1.8 K (symbols) together with the fit of M(H) ...
Figure 5: Magnetization versus magnetic field M(H) of 2 at T = 1.8 K (symbols) together with the fit of M(H) ...
Figure 6: Magnetization versus magnetic field M(H) of 3 at T = 1.8 K (symbols) together with the fit of M(H) ...
Figure 7: Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H and of the corresponding inverse susc...
Figure 8: Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H and of the corresponding inverse susc...
Figure 9: Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H and of the corresponding inverse susc...
Figure 10: Main panel: Difference between the calculated and measured static susceptibility for 3. Inset: Temp...